Mandatory vaccinations and the sacred property of conscience

Language of Liberty

Posted

America was established upon the principles of Liberty. 

James Madison said wrote in 1792: “Conscience is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and unalienable right. To guard a man’s house as his castle, to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith, can give no title to invade a man’s conscience which is more sacred than his castle...”

A new plea of “necessity” is sweeping across America that could change all of that. State legislation that eliminates the essential exception to mandatory vaccinations would remove the right of free exercise of religion for Americas all across the country by mandating them to engage in behavior contrary to their religious beliefs. Americans must prevent this unreasonable intrusion and head the warning of those who founded America.

William Pitt, The Younger warned in 1783: “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom: it is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves.”

Mandating vaccinations without offering parents religious exemptions threatens religious freedom for all. Vaccinations have been available to Americans since the early 1800s. Once governments began attempting to mandate vaccinations upon citizens, many people began to object. This is not simply an issue of eradicating disease; it goes much deeper than that.

Many religious faiths hold murder to be a violation of their beliefs and hold abortion to fall into the category of murder. Shockingly, the list of mandatory vaccinations for children include vaccinations that are derived from aborted fetal tissue. Vaccinations for Chicken Pox, Hepatitis-A, and Rubella, are produced from aborted fetal tissue and at this time, pharmaceutical companies offer no alternatives. According to a report issued by Liberty Counsel, most physicians who oppose abortion do not realize these vaccines are produced from aborted fetal tissue.

The Rubella vaccination know as RA/27/3, developed during the Rubella epidemic of 1964, is so named based on the fact that it is derived from aborted fetal tissue: R stands for Rubella, A stands for Abortus, 27 stands for the 27th fetus tested, and 3 stands for the 3rd tissue explant. In layman’s terms, there were 26 abortions prior to identifying the right formula for the vaccination. Aborted babies were sent to two scientists at the Wistar Institute by the names of Plotkin and Hayflick. By dissecting the kidneys and lungs of these aborted babies Plotkin and Hayflick developed the virus strain identified as WI-38 (Wistar Institute 38). 

Further development of this vaccination was created in the 1970’s from a male baby at 14 weeks gestation. (HistoryOfVaccinies.org – Human Cell Strains in Vaccine Development) The cells from these aborted babies have also been used to create many other commonly used vaccinations, two of which are the Hepatitis-A and Chicken Pox vaccinations. With these facts we can discern that even vaccinations that may not actually contain aborted fetal tissue, were actually developed initially using the cells of aborted babies. (See Liberty Counsel report).

Not only does the Chicken Pox vaccination contain strains derived from aborted babies, it also contains monosodium glutamate (MSG), a chemical compound the FDA has identified as dangerous to infants, children, pregnant women or women of child bearing age, and people with mental or emotional disorders.  According to the Liberty Counsel report, Dr. Arthur Lavin of the Department of Pediatrics at St. Luke’s Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, strongly opposes the chicken pox vaccine. Some experts believe the Chicken Pox vaccination can actually signal a more serious underlying chronic condition called “Atypical Measles.” (See Liberty Counsel report) 

Although the FDA claims less than a 10% chance that serious illness and death caused by vaccinations, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (a federal government program) pays nearly $100 million per year to victims and families for vaccine related disabilities and deaths.

In addition to the dangers and use of aborted babies to create vaccines, many people simply hold sincerely religious beliefs against vaccinations in general. One religious objection is the firmly held belief that God created the human body as a temple and that the body should not be destroyed by injecting a virus into it.

Although a few of the vaccinations containing aborted babies have alternatives that do not contain aborted baby tissue, those alternatives do contain animal bi-products. There are many people that have firmly held convictions against ingesting any animal products into their bodies.

There are less intrusive ways to deal with these issues and the courts are not inconsiderate of the rights of those with deeply held religious beliefs. For example, Liberty Counsel won two cases in New York City where the school system attempted to mandate the Hepatitis-B vaccination on the children of two families.  These families expressed their sincerely held religious beliefs against vaccinations and the schools expelled the children of both families. Liberty Counsel filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of both families and the federal court held that the children had to be readmitted to school and the school could not force the parents to vaccinate their children.

America’s founders fought desperately to establish a place where all could be equally free to live true to their religious beliefs without government intrusion. John Witherspoon, a founder of America and former president of Princeton University said, “There is not a single instance in history in which civil liberty was lost, and religious liberty preserved entire.”

KrisAnne Hall is a constitutional attorney and former prosecutor. Read full article at krisannehall.com.

The Language of Liberty series is an outreach project of Center for Self Governance to educate citizens in the principles of liberty. The views expressed by authors are their own and may not reflect the views of CSG.         

Comments

1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
JC Higgins

Wow! Thank you Ms. Hall for your opinion article. I agree 100% with your articulate and succinct outline defining our liberties and the overreach of the Federal and State governments forcing vaccine passports on American citizens. I am hoping Governor Lee reads your essay and studies your webpage. His weak stance on Tennessee’s vaccine passport has left thousands of non-government employees at risk of losing the civil liberties and having to choose between leaving a job that requires them to get the vaccine, or acquiescing to tyrannical mandates and getting a vaccine that is against their own medical and religious beliefs. All patriots should check out her website listed in her article and make up their own minds what is best for themselves and their families. ‘One size fits all’ medical treatment does not work, as we have seen in recent weeks from the suspension of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine.

Friday, April 23